Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    If the set of non-corresponding positions were non-empty,... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→For any two well-ordered sets, all positions of one well-ordering must correspond to initial positions in the other well-ordering.

    If the set of non-corresponding positions were non-empty, the first elements of those sets would themselves correspond to each other.

    Modality & PossibilityProof of definition segments
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityProof of definition segments

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    But if the first non-corresponding elements correspond, this contradicts the ass...For any two well-ordered sets, all positions of one well-ordering must correspon...For any two well-ordered sets, initial positions in one ordering correspond to i...If not all positions of one well-ordering corresponded to initial positions in t...

    Similar

    If not all positions of one well-ordering corresponded to initial posi...88%But if the first non-corresponding elements correspond, this contradic...86%For any two well-ordered sets, all positions of one well-ordering must...76%For any two well-ordered sets, initial positions in one ordering corre...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: infinity
    View source passageHide passage
    Cantor noted that for any two well-ordered sets, the initial positions in one ordering (the first, the second, the third, etc.) correspond to the initial positions in the other, the way that they do for finite sets. In fact, he showed that all of the positions of one well-ordering must correspond to initial positions in the other. (If this weren’t true, then the set of positions in one that don’t correspond to positions in the other would be non-empty for each set, and the first elements of thes

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective