Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If the soul's operations are causally dependent on bodily conditions, the body exercises genuine causal influence over the soul.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Dependence ≠ causation. A shadow depends on a light source but doesn't cause light. Soul operations may depend on but not be caused by body.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The claim equivocates 'causal influence.' Bodily conditions may be necessary prerequisites without being genuine efficient causes of soul states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If the soul is immaterial substance, physical causation may be metaphysically impossible regardless of empirical correlations observed.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Observable facts show soul operations (thought, emotion, will) vary with brain states, neural chemistry, and bodily health conditions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Causal dependence means B influences A when A's states regularly vary with B's states. Soul operations clearly satisfy this criterion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Denying body-to-soul causation requires implausible pre-established harmony or eliminates the soul's explanatory role entirely.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42