If the uniqueness of an individual is necessary rather than contingent—as with God or the number 1—the concept's extension cannot be expanded even hypothetically, dissolving the generality that Kant's account requires.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

God(Classical theism; used to fix the referent of 'G' in the Bayesian formulation): An eternal, personal being of maximal power, knowledge, and goodness who created the universe
Kant(as used in epistemology and metaphysics): Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an influential German philosopher who argued that our minds shape how we experience reality, and that we can only truly know things as they appear to us, not as they are in themselves.
Necessary(ontological distinction in Mulla Sadra's metaphysics): The principle, God; pure existence without essence, quality or property that undergoes change or motion
Uniqueness(Violated if there are infinitely many forms of oneness, since that entails more than one form corresponds to the property of being one.): The principle that there is at most one form corresponding to any given property.

Based on where you are in your exploration