Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If the will's exercise depends on the intellect's apprehension of the good, freedom is located in the rational judgment, not will alone.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
The intellect's apprehension can present multiple goods; will's freedom lies in selecting among them despite intellect's equal representation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Locating freedom in judgment makes akrasia (acting against better judgment) inexplicable as a genuine exercise of freedom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Will can resist or reject the intellect's apprehension, suggesting will possesses independence not reducible to intellectual determination.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
The will cannot desire what the intellect does not represent as good, so intellect necessarily constrains will's possible actions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Rational judgment determines which goods are apparent, making it the prior condition enabling meaningful choice and moral responsibility.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Without intellectual discernment, will's exercise becomes arbitrary impulse rather than free choice grounded in reasons.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42