Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If there are not enough opporitniites to sin in Hell continually, then it is not that some will sin forever

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Continuous sinning requires continuous opportunities; a finite environment limits available sins to commit.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If Hell's conditions are static and exhaustible, inhabitants would eventually exhaust all possible transgressions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Logical consistency demands: eternal sinning presupposes inexhaustible moral choices available at each moment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.