Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If there is no determinate real self, then grounding responsibility in alignment with it yields indeterminate or arbitrary attributions of blame.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Responsibility may ground in causal narrative and behavioral dispositions rather than metaphysical self-identity; determinacy of action suffices for accountability.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.All responsibility-grounding faces the same challenge; even robust selves require external standards to determine blame, so indeterminacy adds no unique problem.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Practical social systems assign responsibility through functional roles and institutional criteria, not metaphysical facts about the self's determinacy.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Responsibility requires a stable reference point; without a determinate self, we lack criteria for distinguishing authentic from inauthentic choices.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Blame attribution presupposes desert; if the self is indeterminate, we cannot identify who deserves blame or what degree of culpability applies.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Legal and moral systems depend on consistent identity; indeterminate selves would make punishment arbitrary since we couldn't reliably re-identify the responsible agent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.