Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    If two worlds are B-indiscernible globally, then every ob... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Global supervenience fails to entail weak individual supervenience

    If two worlds are B-indiscernible globally, then every object in one world has a B-indiscernible counterpart in the other, satisfying weak supervenience's individual-level condition.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    B-indiscernible(a in w and c in w* are B-indiscernible because B contains only P and Q, and they do not differ on P or Q)
    Two individuals are B-indiscernible if and only if they share all properties in the base set B
    World (in philosophy)(metaphysics and logic)
    A complete possible scenario or reality—a fully detailed way that the universe could be, including all objects, facts, and relationships.
    counterpart(Lewis's modal realism; used to ground de re modal claims without trans-world identity)
    An object y in world w2 is a counterpart of object x in world w1 if y resembles x and nothing else in w2 resembles x more than y.
    individual-level condition(specifying that the rule works for each object separately)
    A requirement that applies to single objects or things, rather than to whole groups or systems.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    supervenience(Philosophy of mind and reduction; contrasted with full reduction)
    A relation in which mental (or higher-level) states are dependent on physiological (or lower-level) states such that any two cases with identical lower-level bases are identical in their higher-level states; a necessary but not sufficient condition for reduction.
    weak supervenience(Violated by world w1 in Petrie's example)
    A supervenience relation where, within a single world, no two individuals can differ in A-properties without differing in B-properties

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Global supervenience fails to entail weak individual supervenience

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective