Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If virtue is acquired through practice and choice, then reason and agency are the primary shapers of moral perspective, not biology.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Biological factors like temperament, trauma responses, and neurochemistry substantially constrain what choices feel possible to agents.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Practice itself selects for those already predisposed; biology determines who practices virtue in the first place.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Reason and choice operate within evolved emotional systems that predate and shape which options reasoning considers moral.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Virtues like courage and temperance visibly improve through deliberate training and repetition, regardless of innate traits.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Humans demonstrate moral flexibility across cultures, suggesting choice shapes ethics more than fixed biological nature.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
We hold people morally accountable for actions, implying they possess genuine agency to have chosen otherwise.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.