Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If virtuous action requires grounding in an end external to the moral law itself, virtue becomes instrumentalized rather than intrinsically obligatory.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Grounding virtue in human flourishing (eudaimonia) doesn't instrumentalize it if flourishing is constituted by virtuous activity itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The distinction between 'intrinsic' and 'instrumental' obligation is artificial; virtues can be both self-justifying and purpose-oriented.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Pure autonomy without any conception of human good is empty; practical reasoning requires some end, making some externality unavoidable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Moral obligation loses its categorical force when action depends on external ends; it becomes hypothetical (if you want X, do Y).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Intrinsic obligatoriness requires that virtue be valued for its own sake, not as a means to happiness, duty, or divine reward.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
When virtue serves external purposes, moral agents act from self-interest rather than respect for the moral law itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.