Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that If we believe our immediate experience exhibits continuity and embraces change, it is because change and continuity are genuinely features of our experience
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Introspection is systematically unreliable and can misrepresent the actual structure of experience, as Schwitzgebel's empirical work on introspective error demonstrates.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The phenomenal appearance of continuity in experience may be a retrospective cognitive construction rather than a direct read-off of experience's actual features.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Dennett's heterophenomenology establishes that what subjects sincerely believe about their experience does not entail that those features are genuinely instantiated in the experience itself.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The inference from 'believed to be a feature of experience' to 'is genuinely a feature of experience' conflates the intentional object of belief with the metaphysical character of the experience.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Beliefs about the character of experience are informed by introspective findings
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Introspection reveals change and continuity as features of our experience
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.