Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that If we only ever perceive species, we lose any epistemic ground for claiming species resemble external things at all.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Species themselves are external things; perceiving their relational and causal structures grounds resemblance claims.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.We need not compare perception-independent objects to reality; coherence and predictive success justify resemblance.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim conflates 'direct access' with epistemic justification; indirect inference can still constitute valid knowledge.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Knowledge requires comparing beliefs to reality; if only species are accessible, we cannot make this comparison.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Resemblance claims require independent access to both relata; we have no direct access to external things themselves.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Without epistemic ground for resemblance, we cannot justify inferring external things exist beyond our perceptions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.