Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Imaginability is a solid test for possibility

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Kant demonstrated that Euclidean geometry was imaginable as the only possible geometry, yet non-Euclidean geometries are mathematically coherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Historical imaginability is constrained by contingent cognitive and conceptual limitations, not by metaphysical necessity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore imaginability tracks epistemic accessibility rather than genuine possibility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Kripke showed that water being XYZ is imaginable under a description yet impossible, since 'water' rigidly designates H2O across all possible worlds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Imaginability operates on descriptions and concepts, while possibility concerns the underlying essences those concepts pick out.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.When concepts fail to transparently reveal essence, imagination systematically misfires as a guide to possibility.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.No clear example has been produced where one can imagine that p and there is also a good argument that it is impossible that p
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.No counterexamples to imaginability entailing possibility have been forthcoming
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.