Immanent universals must be wholly present at multiple distinct locations simultaneously, violating the Lewisian principle that particulars are never wholly present in multiple places.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

David Lewis(the philosopher who created this theory): An influential American philosopher (1941-2001) who developed Counterpart Theory as a way to understand how we talk about objects in different possible worlds.
Immanent universals(Contrasted with transcendent or Platonic universals; targeted by the No Interpenetration argument): Universals that are wholly present at each of their instances and thus spatiotemporally located
Lewisian principle(metaphysics of location): A rule proposed by philosopher David Lewis stating that concrete objects can only be fully present in one location at a time, not multiple places simultaneously.
particulars(Buddhist epistemology (pramāṇa theory)): The actual objects of the world that are directly accessible only through perception and are ineffable — they cannot be captured or referred to by words

Based on where you are in your exploration