Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Imposing nonconsensual risk constitutes a wrongful relati... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Even a maximally expansive probabilistic outcomes framework cannot capture the moral implications of risk-taking per se.

    Imposing nonconsensual risk constitutes a wrongful relation between agent and victim even in possible worlds where no harm materializes, as Claire Finkelstein's work on risk and consent demonstrates.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Claire Finkelstein(cited as the source of this theory about risk and consent)
    A contemporary philosopher who specializes in ethics and law, particularly studying how risk and consent relate to what makes an action morally wrong.
    Harm materializes(distinguishes between actual injury and mere risk of injury)
    When something bad actually happens or becomes real, as opposed to just being a possibility.
    Nonconsensual(describes the type of risk being imposed)
    Something done to you without your permission or agreement.
    Victim(as used in justice philosophy)
    A person who is harmed, injured, or wronged by someone else's actions.
    Wrongful relation(the moral problem being described)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    A situation where one person treats another in a way that violates their rights or dignity, creating an unfair or harmful connection between them.
    agent(Economics terminology applied to medical ethics)
    The party in a principal-agent relationship who is instructed to produce the good or service on the principal's behalf — in the medical context, the doctor
    possible worlds(Leibniz's modal semantics, anticipating contemporary possible-worlds semantics)
    Worlds that have existence in a tenuous sense; fictional worlds used to characterize the nature of possibles that are never actualized
    risk(The author is characterizing and then challenging the standard decision-theoretic conception of risk.)
    In the probabilistic framework under critique, risks are treated as probabilistic mixtures of outcomes.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consequentialism1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Even a maximally expansive probabilistic outcomes framework cannot capture the m...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective