Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    In autonomous progressions, ascent to a theory T_a is per... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Autonomous progressions of theories properly internalize the general concept of progressions of theories

    In autonomous progressions, ascent to a theory T_a is permitted only if a prior accepted theory T_b has already demonstrated that the ordinal index a belongs to the set of constructive ordinals O

    Proof of definition segmentsTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & KnowledgeProof of definition segments

    Key Terms

    Autonomous progressions(as used in mathematical logic and philosophy of mathematics)
    A sequence of increasingly complex logical systems where each new system is justified by the previous one, without needing to appeal to any external authority.
    Constructive ordinals(the set O that determines which theories can be accepted)
    Numbers that can be built up step-by-step using clear, concrete methods—the kinds of numbers you can actually construct or prove exist, rather than just imagine.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Ordinal index(the 'a' in T_a is an ordinal index)
    A number or label that shows the position or order of something in a sequence (like 1st, 2nd, 3rd, but using a more abstract mathematical system).
    Theory(Among the candidate bearers of consistency/inconsistency)
    A set of sentences closed under logical consequence.
    set(von Neumann's class theory)
    A class that is a member (of some class).

    Connections

    1 topic

    Causation1 linked

    Related

    Autonomous progressions of theories properly internalize the general concept of ...This condition ensures the hierarchy is generated by a self-justifying boot-stra...

    Similar

    Autonomous progressions of theories properly internalize the general c...78%The language of the theories contains a formula Acc(x) such that prova...77%The least upper bound of the ordinal indices appearing in the finitist...76%The definability obstacle requires that ordinals be expressible in the...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: proof-theory
    View source passageHide passage
    In the foregoing progressions the ordinals remained external to the theory. Autonomous progressions of theories are the proper internalization of the general concept of progressions. In the autonomous case one is allowed to ascend to a theory \(\bT_a\) only if one already has shown in a previously accepted theory \(\bT_b\) that \(a\in{\cO}\). This idea of generating a hierarchy of theories via a boot-strapping process appeared for the first time in Kreisel 1960, where it was proposed as a way of

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective