Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    In cases of reminding or confession, a speaker means p by... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Grice's analysis [G] of speaker-meaning in terms of intended effects on an audience is open to convincing counterexamples.

    In cases of reminding or confession, a speaker means p by an utterance despite knowing the audience already believes p, so the intended effect cannot be producing belief in p.

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Connections

    1 topic

    Consciousness & Mind1 linked

    Related

    Grice's analysis [G] of speaker-meaning in terms of intended effects on an audie...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    In cases where a speaker intends an audience to believe a conclusion on the basi...
    In uses of language in thought, there is no intended audience at all, yet speake...

    Similar

    Meaning p by an utterance cannot simply be a matter of intending that ...83%Merely intending to cause a belief is insufficient for speaker meaning...81%Determinacy requires that a speaker must believe and implicate p for t...80%Speakers typically utter S only if they believe p, and typically come ...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: meaning
    View source passageHide passage
    However, even if [G] can be given a fairly plausible motivation, and fits many cases rather well, it is also open to some convincing counterexamples. Three such types of cases are: (i) cases in which the speaker means p by an utterance despite knowing that the audience already believes p, as in cases of reminding or confession; (ii) cases in which a speaker means p by an utterance, such as the conclusion of an argument, which the speaker intends an audience to believe on the basis of evidence ra

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective