Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that In illusion cases, the perceiver directly experiences sense-data rather than material things.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Illusion cases involve misperception of actual material things, not substitution of a different object of experience.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The bent-stick illusion presents a real stick under distorting conditions, so the stick itself remains the direct perceptual object.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Positing sense-data as intermediary objects commits a category error by treating adverbial qualities of experience as noun-like entities.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The argument from illusion illegitimately generalizes from cases of misrepresentation to conclusions about the fundamental nature of all perceptual objects.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Austin demonstrated that 'directly perceive' is systematically misused in sense-datum theory, lacking any stable contrastive meaning.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Sense-data are not material things.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
In illusion cases, the perceiver experiences sense-data.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Experiencing sense-data is distinct from experiencing material things.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.