Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    In models that permit violation of λ-independence, superl... — Carmelics
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→In models that do not exclude violations of λ-independence, controllable probabilistic dependence is not a necessary condition for superluminal signaling.

    In models that permit violation of λ-independence, superluminal signaling can occur through mechanisms other than controllable probabilistic dependence.

    Causation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Causation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    In models that do not exclude violations of λ-independence, controllable probabi...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The necessary and sufficient conditions for superluminal signaling differ across...

    Similar

    In models that do not exclude violations of λ-independence, controllab...96%The necessary and sufficient conditions for superluminal signaling dif...92%Violation of λ-independence would imply the possibility of superlumina...91%If λ-distribution held, superluminal signaling would be possible in pr...83%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: qm-action-distance
    View source passageHide passage
    Note that the necessary and sufficient conditions for superluminal signaling are different in models that do not exclude in theory the violation of λ-independence. In such models controllable probabilistic dependence is not a necessary condition for superluminal signaling. The reasoning is as follows. Consider any empirically adequate model of the EPR/B experiment in which the pair's state and the settings of the measurement apparatuses are the only relevant factors for the probabilities of meas

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective