In the jumble argument, the premises are not independently plausible but are jointly believed, and collective belief does not entail apparent individual acceptability of each premise.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

1 reason for

1 reason against

Reasons For

1 perspective

Reason for

1 perspective

Reason against

Based on where you are in your exploration

Apparent individual acceptability(as used in logic and argumentation): How reasonable or believable each separate statement seems when you examine it by itself.
Collective belief(as used in social epistemology): Something that a group accepts as true together, like a shared conviction held by multiple people or a community.
Entail(In logical reasoning and argumentation): To logically follow or guarantee as a necessary consequence; if something is true, what does it force to also be true?
Independently plausible(as used in logic and argumentation): Believable or reasonable on its own, without needing help from other ideas to make sense.
Jointly believed(as used in epistemology): Accepted or believed together as a group, rather than each one being believed separately.
jumble argument(Sorensen's construction used to challenge Sainsbury's definition of paradox): An argument formed by taking the negation of one of a person's beliefs as the conclusion and treating that person's remaining beliefs as the premises
premises(as used in logic and philosophical arguments): Starting statements or assumptions that are used to support a conclusion—like the opening claims in an argument that lead to a final point.

1 topic