Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that In the state of aesthetic perception, the subject of experience assumes a universalistic quality
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Aesthetic perception is always perspectival and embodied, rooted in a particular perceiver's sensory and cultural situatedness.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
A subject cannot shed its particularity through attention alone, as Merleau-Ponty's phenomenology of perception demonstrates.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Therefore, the aesthetic subject retains individuality rather than dissolving into universality during perceptual engagement.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The inference from universality of objects to universality of subjects commits the fallacy of assuming subject-object symmetry.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Kant's analytic of the sublime shows that aesthetic experience intensifies self-awareness as a finite, particular subject confronting the infinite.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
The quality of the subject of experience must correspond to the quality of the object of experience
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
In aesthetic perception, the objects of experience are universalistic
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.