Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that In violent motion, the external mover supplants the body's natural tendency, dissolving the internal resistance that grounds proportional calculation.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Even in violent motion, internal properties (mass, density, friction) remain operative and measurable, not dissolved by external force application.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Proportional calculation works precisely in violent motion (ballistics, mechanics), suggesting internal resistance grounds ratios even under external dominance.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Natural and violent motion differ in cause, not in the body's capacity to sustain measurable resistance ratios inherent to its constitution.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
External forces (like projectile motion) do override intrinsic properties, creating qualitatively different motion than bodies naturally exhibit.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
When external movers dominate, bodies lose their characteristic restraint, making proportional ratios between force and resistance unmeasurable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Internal resistance derives from a body's nature; violent displacement suspends this nature, thereby suspending the basis for calculating proportions.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42