Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Incapacitating a non-responsible agent while maintaining ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→It can be justified to incapacitate dangerous offenders even if they are not morally responsible for what they have done or for the danger they present.

    Incapacitating a non-responsible agent while maintaining coercive institutional force against them is internally incoherent within any framework that grounds legitimate detention in agency.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Coercive institutional force(in political philosophy and ethics)
    When an official system (like a prison or government) uses its power to force people to do things against their will.
    Incapacitating(in criminal justice)
    Making someone unable to do something, usually by removing their freedom or ability to act.
    Internally incoherent(in logic and philosophy)
    When an idea contradicts itself or breaks its own rules—like saying 'all rules must be broken' (which breaks the rule it's stating).
    Legitimate detention(in criminal justice ethics)
    Lawfully and justifiably holding someone against their will, usually in prison, based on reasons that are morally and legally acceptable.
    Non-responsible agent(in ethics and law)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    A person who cannot be held accountable for their actions because they lack the mental capacity to understand what they're doing or control their behavior (like a young child or someone with severe cognitive disabilities).
    agency(Used to assess whether switching the trolley is deontologically prohibited.)
    A morally relevant sense in which an agent is the direct cause of harm, invoked in deontological constraints; its absence removes a deontological bar to acting.
    framework(Carnap's philosophy of language and logic)
    A structured system of rules or language that must be in place for rational discourse to be possible.
    grounds(Used in the context of justifying beliefs about the future on the basis of past information)
    Information or evidence that confers rational entitlement to hold a belief or assumption

    Connections

    1 topic

    Justice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    It can be justified to incapacitate dangerous offenders even if they are not mor...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective