Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Incommensurable ends cannot all be achieved simultaneously. — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→No choice between competing ends can be interpersonally justified.

    Incommensurable ends cannot all be achieved simultaneously.

    Justice & PunishmentModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentModality & Possibility

    Connections

    4 topics

    Virtue Ethics2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Moral Responsibility
    2 linked
    Consequentialism1 linked
    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    No choice between competing ends can be interpersonally justified.The pursuit of one end necessarily means other ends will not be achieved.There is no interpersonally justifiable way to rank ends against one another.Values and ends are plural.

    Similar

    If an end is not possible, it cannot be made sense of as an end at all81%It is not always possible to fulfill all obligations one is under simu...75%Letting all others in is impossible73%These claims cannot be simultaneously satisfied without contradiction73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: liberalism
    View source passageHide passage
    In his famous defence of negative liberty, Berlin insisted that values or ends are plural, and further, the pursuit of one end necessarily implies that other ends will not be achieved. In this sense ends collide. In economic terms, the pursuit of one end entails opportunity costs: foregone pursuits which cannot be impersonally shown to be less worthy. There is no interpersonally justifiable way to rank the ends, and no way to achieve them all. Each person must devote herself to some ends at the

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective