Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Increasing the balance of objective value (good) to disva... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Objective meaning in life does not require immortality

    Increasing the balance of objective value (good) to disvalue (evil) can make a real difference in the world even without immortality

    Consequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consequentialism

    Connections

    2 topics

    Virtue Ethics1 linkedAfterlife & Death1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    Objective meaning in life does not require immortalityThe achievement of good works, or the mitigation of suffering and pain, can resu...The actions of Lincoln made the world better than it would have been absent thos...

    Similar

    The achievement of good works, or the mitigation of suffering and pain...74%Conduct that sacrifices happiness in a particular case is justified on...74%If one chooses to live, one must value one's own long-term survival as...74%All moral actions necessarily aim at ends, and the end moral actions a...73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: pragmatic-belief-god
    View source passageHide passage
    This argument rests on several controversial assumptions. For one, the argument assumes that a divine conferral of purpose is necessary for one’s life to have meaning and purpose. Presumably, the idea is that a self-conferral of purpose would be arbitrary and limited by human ignorance or uncertainty as to what is genuinely worthwhile. A conferral by God, however, would not be arbitrary as God would confer only a purpose that is objectively worthwhile. Another assumption is that objective meanin

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective