Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Indeterminate identity propagates through time, so ND cannot yield a determinate verdict of distinctness at t' from an indeterminate basis at t.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Indeterminacy at t may concern epistemic access, not metaphysical facts—which remain determinate and propagate.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Identity standards (continuity, spatiotemporal tracking) can yield determinate verdicts even from indeterminate bases.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
ND's verdict-generating procedure may operate at t' on determinate facts there, bypassing t's indeterminacy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If identity facts at t are indeterminate, no determinate facts obtain at t to ground determinate identity at t'.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Temporal dynamics cannot generate determinacy from indeterminacy without additional metaphysical resources.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Non-descriptive verdicts require determinate input conditions; indeterminacy at t undercuts this requirement.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.