Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Individuals need shared thought and discussion to justify... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Rights & Liberty
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Censorship, even of false belief, harms both those whose speech is suppressed and their audience.

    Individuals need shared thought and discussion to justify their beliefs and actions.

    Rights & LibertyTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Rights & LibertyTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Censorship, even of false belief, harms both those whose speech is suppressed an...Even false beliefs, when discussed, contribute to the deliberative process that ...Suppressing speech removes epistemic resources that speakers and audiences rely ...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Rights & Liberty
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Individuals require freedom of thought and discussion to adequately ju...86%Freedoms of thought and discussion are essential to the justification ...86%For a belief p to be justified, S must be able to infer p from some ot...75%The argument from moral disagreement confirms the need for justificati...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: mill-moral-political
    View source passageHide passage
    Mill’s claim that the value of freedom of expression lies in keeping true beliefs from becoming dogmatic reflects his view that freedoms of thought and discussion are necessary for fulfilling our natures as progressive beings (OL II 20). For instance, Mill appeals to a familiar distinction between true belief, on the one hand, and knowledge, understood as something like justified true belief, on the other hand (II 22; cf. Scanlon 1972; Ten 1980: 126–28). Progressive beings seek knowledge or just

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective