Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Insisting justification matters for anticipation creates ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Two positions can share a conclusion about exponentiation while differing so fundamentally in justification that no genuine anticipation relation holds between them.

    Insisting justification matters for anticipation creates ad-hoc criteria; standard philosophical usage ties anticipation to empirical or logical overlap, not metaphysical justification.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Anticipation(Heidegger's analytic of Dasein's temporality)
    Authentic projection; the predominantly futural aspect of authentic temporalizing
    Empirical
    # Empirical Empirical means based on real observation, experience, or experiments rather than theory or guessing. When something is empirical, it's proven by actually testing it or seeing it happen in the real world, not just thinking about it logically. For example, empirical evidence might be data collected from a survey or results from a scientific experiment that shows what actually occurs.
    Metaphysical justification(in metaphysics)
    An explanation that appeals to how reality is fundamentally structured, rather than just how language works or how we find it convenient to speak.
    ad-hoc criteria(in philosophical argumentation)
    Rules or standards that are made up on the spot to solve a specific problem, rather than being part of a larger, consistent system.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    justification(Third condition of the tripartite account of knowledge)
    The condition on a knower's belief that excludes mere luck — the belief must be held in a way that is appropriate or warranted, not merely accidentally correct.
    logical overlap(in logic)
    When two ideas or statements share common ground in the way they connect to each other through reasoning.

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    Two positions can share a conclusion about exponentiation while differing so fun...

    Related

    Two positions can share a conclusion about exponentiation while differing so fun...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective