Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Institutions, as Rawlsian 'basic structures' or Searlean ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Institutions themselves cannot properly be (mis)recognized, only acknowledged or not.

    Institutions, as Rawlsian 'basic structures' or Searlean systems of deontic status functions, have no self-realization to be impaired—their functional integrity is disrupted, not their dignity.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Basic structures(Rawls's term for the major institutions that affect everyone)
    The fundamental institutions and systems in a society (like government, courts, and the economy) that shape how power and resources are distributed among people.
    Deontic status functions(Searle's term for socially created powers and authorities)
    Rules or roles that we collectively agree give certain people or groups the right to do something (like how a referee has the authority to call fouls in sports).
    Functional integrity(how institutions operate, distinct from human dignity)
    When something is working properly and doing what it's designed to do without problems or breakdowns.
    Rawlsian
    "Rawlsian" refers to the ideas of philosopher John Rawls, who developed an influential theory of what makes a society fair and just. His key idea is that a fair society should be organized as if people didn't know what position they'd occupy in it—meaning the rules should benefit everyone, especially the least advantaged, since anyone could end up in that situation. Rawls fundamentally changed how people think about justice and equality in modern democracies.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Searlean(referring to Searle's specific philosophical approach)
    Related to the ideas of John Searle, a philosopher who studied how humans create meaning and rules through shared agreement.
    dignity(Schiller's aesthetic framework contrasting dignity with grace)
    The sensible expression of successfully willing to act in accordance with moral principles even at the cost of the suppression of conflicting desires and feelings, manifest in different aspects of appearance than grace.
    self-realization(Russell's clarification that desire-satisfaction ethics need not be sordid or narrowly self-interested.)
    The fulfillment of one's own desires, which Russell identifies with duty; can be achieved through self-sacrifice.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Social Contract1 linkedPhilosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    Institutions themselves cannot properly be (mis)recognized, only acknowledged or...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective