Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Interdependent individuals would consent to the establishment of state authority and law.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Hume argues that consent to political authority is largely fictitious, as most subjects never actually consent but are born into existing states.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Tacit consent theories (Locke notwithstanding) conflate mere residence or non-emigration with genuine voluntary agreement.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Without actual consent, the social contract describes hypothetical rational acceptance, not a normatively binding political obligation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Anarchist thinkers like Kropotkin demonstrate that interdependent communities historically resolved conflict through mutual aid without centralized state authority.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The inference from endemic conflict to state authority commits a false dilemma by excluding non-state institutions as conflict-resolving mechanisms.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Interdependence among individuals produces endemic conflict.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
This conflict creates Hobbesian insecurity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Fear of Hobbesian insecurity leads all individuals to consent to state authority to escape it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.