Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Intuitionist moral epistemology (Ross, Prichard) holds th... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Deliberation assigns weights to prized qualities in the context of choice rather than taking those weights as given.

    Intuitionist moral epistemology (Ross, Prichard) holds that the relative stringency of prima facie duties is apprehended directly, not constructed through contextual weighing.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Moral disagreement persists even among rational agents with identical factual knowledge, suggesting duty-stringency isn't constructed but directly perceived.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Constructivist accounts struggle to explain why contextual weighing feels constrained by objective limits rather than purely plastic.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Expert moral judges (like ethicists) show convergence on hard cases, paralleling perceptual expertise in other domains.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If stringency were directly apprehended, we'd expect less cultural and historical variation in duty hierarchies across societies.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Intuitionists cannot explain how intuitive apprehension reliably tracks moral truth independent of evolutionary pressures shaping our moral sense.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The claim conflates phenomenological directness with metaphysical non-constructedness—duties may feel immediate yet still be constructed.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Virtue Ethics1 linked

    Related

    Constructivist accounts struggle to explain why contextual weighing feels constr...Deliberation assigns weights to prized qualities in the context of choice rather...Expert moral judges (like ethicists) show convergence on hard cases, paralleling...If stringency were directly apprehended, we'd expect less cultural and historica...
    +3 moreShow less
    Intuitionists cannot explain how intuitive apprehension reliably tracks moral tr...Moral disagreement persists even among rational agents with identical factual kn...The claim conflates phenomenological directness with metaphysical non-constructe...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit