Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Investigators fulfill their obligations by giving candida... — Carmelics
    Home/Bioethics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Enrolling a research candidate in a trial remains legitimate even when the candidate fails to comprehend disclosed information despite repeated efforts.

    Investigators fulfill their obligations by giving candidates the opportunity to issue autonomous authorization.

    BioethicsRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    BioethicsRights & Liberty

    Connections

    2 topics

    Justice & Punishment2 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Bioethics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Moral Responsibility
    1 linked

    Related

    Enrolling a research candidate in a trial remains legitimate even when the candi...Investigators avoid potential fraud by providing disclosure.Investigators treat candidates fairly by offering the opportunity for informed c...Providing the opportunity for autonomous authorization, avoiding fraud, and trea...

    Similar

    Providing the opportunity for autonomous authorization, avoiding fraud...80%Investigators treat candidates fairly by offering the opportunity for ...73%If autonomous authorization were the sole point of informed consent, s...71%Contracts that cannot be entered into autonomously should not be legal...70%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: informed-consent
    View source passageHide passage
    When comprehension remains poor despite repeated efforts to elicit comprehension, what should investigators do? Is enlistment in a trial illegitimate, because no autonomous authorization took place (Faden and Beauchamp 1986; Candilis and Lidz 2010)? Some philosophers respond that it remains legitimate, because by giving candidates the opportunity to issue autonomous authorization, investigators do their parts (Sreenivasan 2003), avoid any potential fraud (Millum and Bromwich 2013), and treat the

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective