Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    It could be that b can bring about more states of affairs... — Carmelics
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A being with maximal power cannot necessarily bring about whatever any other agent can bring about.

    It could be that b can bring about more states of affairs than a can, rather than the other way around.

    Divine Attributes
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Divine Attributes

    Related

    A being with maximal power cannot necessarily bring about whatever any other age...If agent a can bring about state s and agent b cannot, it does not follow that b...

    Similar

    If agent a can bring about state s and agent b cannot, it does not fol...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Divine Attributes
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    77%
    If an agent has the power to bring about a state of affairs, then it i...73%
    Necessarily, for any state of affairs s, if an agent a brings about s,...71%
    It is not possible for an agent to bring about an impossible state of ...70%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: omnipotence
    View source passageHide passage
    Let us return to the historical question of Locke’s understanding of infinite power. Locke explicitly rejects the notion that there is an infinite cardinal number. He takes the contention that there is such a number to be absurd. Rather, Locke appears to understand infinite power as unlimited power, consistent with the Aristotelean notion that infinities are “potential” and never completed, as well as with the empiricist idea that infinity is a wholly negative notion. The infinite sets discussed earlier are “actual” or completed infinities. According to one fairly common understanding of unlim...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective