Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    It is a philosophical mistake to seek a cause of an etern... — Carmelics
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    It is a philosophical mistake to seek a cause of an eternal or beginningless causal series.

    Causation
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.A cause must be prior to its effect in time.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Nothing can be temporally prior to a series of causes and effects that has no beginning or exists for eternity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Natural TheologyCausation

    Connections

    1 topic

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Modality & Possibility
    1 linked

    Related

    A cause must be prior to its effect in time.Nothing can be temporally prior to a series of causes and effects that has no be...

    Similar

    In a causal series of contingent beings without a temporal beginning, ...78%Nothing can be temporally prior to a series of causes and effects that...78%There cannot be an infinite succession of causes and effects without a...78%God's existence can be established indirectly by tracing the causal ch...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: hume-religion
    View source passageHide passage
    The step in this argument that seems most questionable is the claim that because each element in the causal chain has been explained, in terms of some earlier member of the chain, we have “sufficiently explained” why there exists any such chain or why this particular chain exists. Critics will argue that this has plainly not been done. One response to this is argue that it is a philosophical mistake to look for an explanation of this kind, on the ground that a cause must be prior to its effect i
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit