Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    It is agreed that Christ is one person and one hypostasis. — Carmelics
    Home/Trinity
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The locution 'discernible in two natures' ought to be abandoned in Christological discourse.

    It is agreed that Christ is one person and one hypostasis.

    All sources support itTrinity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    TrinityAll sources support it

    Connections

    2 topics

    Proof of definition segments3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Trinity
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Philosophy of Language
    2 linked

    Related

    'Particular nature' is synonymous with 'hypostasis', which is itself synonymous ...The locution 'discernible in two natures' ought to be abandoned in Christologica...The term 'nature' has two applications: universal (e.g., the nature of man in ge...Therefore Christ can have only one particular nature, not two.
    +2 moreShow less
    Therefore the reference must be to particular natures — the particular nature of...When speaking of two natures unified in Christ, the reference cannot be to unive...

    Similar

    Christ is one hypostasis and one person.95%'Particular nature' is synonymous with 'hypostasis', which is itself s...77%If hypostasis is not an accident, it must be a primary substance in th...76%'Particular nature' means the same as 'hypostasis'.73%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: philoponus
    View source passageHide passage
    In Arbiter (Arbitrator or Umpire), written about the same time as the Council of Constantinople and surviving only in Syriac translation, Philoponus takes the view that the locution ‘discernible in two natures’ ought to be abandoned. His main strategy is to argue that in this context the meaning of the terms ‘nature’ and ‘hypóstasis’ are essentially identical, so that if Christ is (according to (3)) one hypóstasis he cannot also (as in (4)) be discernible in two natures. The argument goes roughl

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective