Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that It is difficult to maintain that all natural language predicates have a fixed degree.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Generative grammar (Chomsky) posits that surface-level multigrade predicates reduce to fixed-arity structures at logical form via argument-position saturation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If logical form systematically assigns hidden arguments (e.g., Davidson's event semantics assigns a fixed event variable to all action predicates), apparent arity variability is a syntactic illusion.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A demonstration that no systematic strategy exists in surface grammar does not preclude a systematic strategy operating at a deeper level of linguistic representation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Frege's context principle holds that the meaning of a predicate is determined by its role in complete sentences, not by isolated inspection of argument slots.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Under a Fregean analysis, 'eats' in 'John eats' and 'John eats cake' expresses the same concept with unsaturated positions fixed by sentential context, not variable arity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If apparent arity differences reflect contextual saturation of a single fixed-degree concept rather than genuine multigrade predicates, the claim that natural language resists fixed-degree analysis is undermined.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Strategies such as paraphrasing "John is eating" as "John is eating something" can resist some cases of apparent multigrade predicates.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.No systematic and convincing strategy has been found that handles all cases of apparent multigrade predicates in natural language.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.