Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    It is necessarily true that God creates w* — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    It is necessarily true that God creates w*

    Divine AttributesModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Being the best possible world is an essential property of whatever world has it
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.w* is the best possible world
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Therefore it is necessarily true that w* is the best possible world
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Necessarily creating any particular world is incompatible with divine freedom, as Leibniz himself acknowledged God deliberates among compossibles.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God necessarily creates w*, God lacks libertarian freedom, collapsing into Spinozistic necessitarianism where God cannot do otherwise.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Divine aseity requires that God's creative act be contingent, not necessitated by any external standard like 'bestness'.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The predicate 'best possible world' may be undefined if the set of possible worlds is infinite and unbounded, as Swinburne and others argue.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If no world is uniquely best because for any candidate world a better world is conceivable, then P2 is necessarily false and the argument fails.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Divine AttributesModality & Possibility

    Related

    Being the best possible world is an essential property of whatever world has itDivine aseity requires that God's creative act be contingent, not necessitated b...God necessarily creates the best possible worldIf God necessarily creates w*, God lacks libertarian freedom, collapsing into Sp...
    +5 moreShow less
    If no world is uniquely best because for any candidate world a better world is c...Necessarily creating any particular world is incompatible with divine freedom, a...The predicate 'best possible world' may be undefined if the set of possible worl...Therefore it is necessarily true that w* is the best possible worldw* is the best possible world

    Similar

    God has created w*87%It has not been shown that w* has the relation to the actual world tha...78%In w', T and T' are not identical.78%By the Necessity of Distinctness (ND), if T and T' are distinct in w',...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: edwards
    View source passageHide passage
    An apparent consequence is that God must create a world to display his glory. End of Creation contends both that God's perfections include “a propensity of nature to diffuse of his own fullness” and that it isn't “possible for him to be hindered in the exercise of his goodness and his other perfections in their proper effect.” (End of Creation, 1765; Edwards 1957–, vol. 8, 447) It follows that God must diffuse his own fullness, i. e., God must create. Edwards also appears committed to the claim
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit