Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    It is not immediately evident that all functions in Brouw... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    It is not immediately evident that all functions in Brouwer's sense must be continuous.

    Modality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Brouwer's concept of function is less restrictive than Weyl's.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Brouwer did not dismiss the possibility that discontinuous functions could be defined on proper parts of a continuum.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Brouwer's continuity theorem, proven within intuitionistic mathematics, entails that every total function from the continuum to naturals is continuous.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Any function defined on a spread in Brouwer's sense must be determined by finite initial segments of choice sequences, which structurally necessitates continuity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The bar theorem and fan theorem, central to Brouwer's own mathematical practice, collectively enforce continuity on all functions defined over the full continuum.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Troelstra and van Dalen demonstrate in 'Constructivism in Mathematics' that intuitionistic function-existence requires lawlike or choice-sequence definability, ruling out discontinuous cases.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A function on Brouwer's continuum that were discontinuous would require completed infinite information at a point, contradicting the temporal, constructive nature of choice sequences.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Philosophy of Language1 linked

    Related

    A function on Brouwer's continuum that were discontinuous would require complete...Any function defined on a spread in Brouwer's sense must be determined by finite...Brouwer did not dismiss the possibility that discontinuous functions could be de...Brouwer's concept of function is less restrictive than Weyl's.
    +3 moreShow less
    Brouwer's continuity theorem, proven within intuitionistic mathematics, entails ...The bar theorem and fan theorem, central to Brouwer's own mathematical practice,...Troelstra and van Dalen demonstrate in 'Constructivism in Mathematics' that intu...

    Similar

    Weyl's claim that all functions defined on a continuum are continuous ...90%Weyl confines attention to functions which turn out to be continuous b...88%Brouwer proved in 1924 that every function defined on a closed interva...79%Brouwer did not dismiss the possibility that discontinuous functions c...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: weyl
    View source passageHide passage
    Weyl also agreed with Brouwer that all functions everywhere defined on a continuum are continuous, but here certain subtle differences of viewpoint emerge. Weyl contends that what mathematicians had taken to be discontinuous functions actually consist of several continuous functions defined on separated continua. In Weyl’s view, for example, the “discontinuous” function defined by \(f(x) = 0\) for \(x \lt 0\) and \(f(x) = 1\) for \(x \ge 0\) in fact consists of the two functions with const
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit