Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    It is only when resentment is indulged and allowed to ble... — Carmelics
    Home/Forgiveness & Mercy
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Forgiveness is not the forswearing or overcoming of resentment.

    It is only when resentment is indulged and allowed to bleed into revenge that a violation of goodwill occurs.

    Forgiveness & Mercy
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Forgiveness & Mercy

    Related

    Forgiveness is not the forswearing or overcoming of resentment.Resentment itself is natural and innocent.The work of forgiveness is to prevent resentment from leading us to seek revenge...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Forgiveness & Mercy
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The work of forgiveness is to prevent resentment from leading us to se...80%Butler held that resentment serves the public good and is compatible w...79%Butler did not hold that resentment is a response to injury that is in...79%Butler actually says that forgiveness is perfectly compatible with an ...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: forgiveness
    View source passageHide passage
    Butler does say that resentment can be dangerous, but it is not resentment as such that is the problem. Rather, he claims that when resentment is allowed to become “excessive” it can easily lead an agent to pursue revenge, not as a means to producing some greater social good, but as a self-gratifying exercise that seeks “the misery of our fellow creatures” [IX.10]. But to let resentment carry one this far is to violate a general obligation to benevolence. To forgive, then, is simply to prevent resentment from having this effect on us. The divine command to benevolence is therefore just the com...

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective