Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that It is plausible that human motivation always includes an other-regarding component.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Psychological egoism, defended by Hobbes and Mandeville, holds that all motivation reduces to self-interest, including apparent concern for others.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.What appears as other-regarding motivation is consistently explicable as instrumental self-interest, reputation management, or anticipated reciprocity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The unfalsifiability of the claim that motivation 'always includes' an other-regarding component renders it empirically vacuous rather than plausible.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Batson's empathy-altruism research, while influential, has been challenged by Cialdini's mood-management hypothesis, showing other-regarding behavior reduces to self-directed affect regulation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the other-regarding component can always be redescribed as a self-regarding state, the distinction between egoistic and altruistic motivation collapses conceptually.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Actions taken for oneself routinely affect others.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Agents care about those others to some degree.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.It is difficult to find evidence against the hypothesis that ultimate motivation always includes an other-regarding component.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.