Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that It is true that God exists in all metaphysically possible worlds, but only because in God essence and existence are the same.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Necessary existence is a modal property, not an identity relation between essence and existence within a being.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Kripke's possible worlds semantics grounds necessity in truth across all worlds without requiring Thomistic essence-existence identity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A being can be necessarily existent if its non-existence is impossible in every world, regardless of its internal metaphysical constitution.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.If God's essence just is his existence, then 'God exists' becomes analytically true, collapsing necessary existence into a trivial logical truth.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Kant's critique establishes that existence is not a predicate, so identifying essence with existence produces a category error, not a metaphysical explanation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.God is identical to his existence.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The lack of a distinction between essence and existence is what makes a necessary being necessary.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.