Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that It remains mysterious how any phenomenal property could make other phenomenal characteristics appear to be less than wholly present
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Presentedness is supposed to be the phenomenal property that makes some contents seem less temporally present than others
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The force-and-vivacity construal of presentedness fails to account for differences in temporal presence
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Broad provides no alternative account of how presentedness achieves this effect
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.