Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that John Hick's soul-making theodicy treats natural evil as a necessary condition for the development of virtues like courage, compassion, and moral seriousness.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Gratuitous suffering exists beyond what virtue development requires; a benevolent God would minimize unnecessary pain.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Children dying from disease doesn't develop their virtues; innocent suffering fails the soul-making justification.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Omnipotent beings could create virtue-developing challenges without natural evils causing mass suffering and death.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Virtues like courage require genuine danger/suffering to develop; comfortable conditions make moral growth impossible.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Natural evils create real stakes for moral choice, distinguishing authentic virtue from mere preference or habit.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Compassion cannot emerge without exposure to suffering; empathy requires experiential understanding of pain.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.