Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Judgement cannot consist in awareness of ideas that do no... — Carmelics
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→False judgement is impossible under empiricism

    Judgement cannot consist in awareness of ideas that do not exist at all

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind2 linkedSkepticism

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    2 linked

    Related

    According to empiricism, judgement consists in awareness of ideas exactly as the...According to empiricism, we are immediately and incorrigibly aware of our own id...False judgement is impossible under empiricismJudgement cannot consist in awareness of ideas not present to our minds, because...

    Similar

    Judgement cannot consist in awareness of ideas not present to our mind...90%Simple ideas cannot be invented but must be acquired by immediate intu...82%One can understand what something is and also know that it does not ex...82%Physical objects do not exist independently of minds but consist solel...80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: plato-theaetetus
    View source passageHide passage
    Notice that it is the empiricist who will most naturally tend to rely on this analogy. It is the empiricist who finds it natural to assimilate judgement and knowledge to perception, so far as he can. So we may suggest that the Second Puzzle is a mere sophistry for any decent account of false judgement, but a good argument against the empiricist account of false judgement that Plato is attacking. The moral of the Second Puzzle is that empiricism validates the old sophistry because it treats belie

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective