Judgements about the conditions of experience are epistemically harder to verify than judgements about experiential contents, since the conditions are not directly presented as objects.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Conditions of experience(as contrasted with the actual content of what we experience): The underlying factors or circumstances that make experience possible in the first place—like how our senses, minds, or the physical world have to be set up for us to experience anything.
Directly presented as objects(as used to explain why experiential contents are easier to verify than conditions): Immediately available to our senses or awareness in the same way we can directly see a chair or feel pain.
Epistemically(as how you should evaluate your own beliefs): In a way that relates to knowledge—meaning you understand something based on actual information or justified reasons, not just guessing.
Experiential contents(as what phenomenalism claims objects reduce to): The specific sensations, perceptions, and feelings that make up what we consciously experience—the actual stuff of our conscious experience.

Based on where you are in your exploration