Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Judgment is objectively rather than subjectively valid, a... — Carmelics
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Judgment is objectively rather than subjectively valid, and therefore exhibits universality and necessity.

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Objective validity is characterized by universality and necessity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Judgment is objectively valid rather than merely subjectively valid (B142).
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Hume's naturalism shows that what appears as necessary judgment is merely habitual psychological association projected onto experience.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If necessity is a product of cognitive habit rather than a priori structure, objective validity collapses into a sophisticated form of subjective validity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Kant's response presupposes the very categorial framework whose objectivity is in question, rendering the argument circular.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Quine's critique of the analytic-synthetic distinction undermines the a priori status Kant assigns to the categories grounding objective judgment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Without a defensible a priori/empirical boundary, universality and necessity become matters of degree within a web of belief, not categorical properties of judgment.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Related

    Hume's naturalism shows that what appears as necessary judgment is merely habitu...If necessity is a product of cognitive habit rather than a priori structure, obj...Judgment is objectively valid rather than merely subjectively valid (B142).Kant's response presupposes the very categorial framework whose objectivity is i...
    +3 moreShow less
    Objective validity is characterized by universality and necessity.Quine's critique of the analytic-synthetic distinction undermines the a priori s...Without a defensible a priori/empirical boundary, universality and necessity bec...

    Similar

    Judgment is objectively valid rather than merely subjectively valid (B...92%Representations that are universal and necessary are objectively valid...89%Objective validity is characterized by universality and necessity.88%Necessary universal validity constitutes objective validity.87%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: kant-transcendental
    View source passageHide passage
    In §19, Kant argues that there must be a certain way in which each of my representations is unified in the subject, and he identifies this way with judgment: “I find that a judgment is nothing but the manner in which given cognitions are brought to the objective unity of apperception” (B141). Judgment, Kant proposes, is objectively rather than subjectively valid, and hence exhibits the type of universality and necessity that characterizes objective validity (B142). He then claims that without sy
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit