Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Just as prudence aims at one agent's happiness, an impart... — Carmelics
    Home/Consequentialism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Morality, being impartial, aims at happiness as such (i.e., the happiness of all).

    Just as prudence aims at one agent's happiness, an impartial moral point of view aims at happiness without restriction to any particular agent.

    Consequentialism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Consequentialism

    Connections

    3 topics

    Virtue Ethics1 linkedJustice & Punishment1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Consequentialism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Moral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Morality is impartial in a way that prudence is not.Morality, being impartial, aims at happiness as such (i.e., the happiness of all...Prudence aims at the agent's own happiness.

    Similar

    Morality, being impartial, aims at happiness as such (i.e., the happin...82%The same relation that holds between an agent and their own happiness ...81%The moral point of view is impartial.81%Morality is impartial in a way that prudence is not.80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: mill-moral-political
    View source passageHide passage
    On this reading, Mill is not trying to derive utilitarianism from egoism (see Hall 1949). Rather, he is assuming that the moral point of view is impartial in a way that prudence is not. Just as prudence aims at the agent’s own happiness, so too, Mill thinks, morality, which is impartial, aims at happiness as such. On this reading, the structure of Mill’s proof looks something like this.

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective