Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Justifying a theory of inference requires justifying all ... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Truth & Knowledge
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Dynamic principles like Conditionalization must be justified in order to justify a proper theory of inference and answer Hume's challenge

    Justifying a theory of inference requires justifying all principles the theory appeals to

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Truth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Skepticism2 linked

    Related

    A full theory of inference that answers Hume's challenge must appeal to addition...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Truth & Knowledge
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Dynamic principles like Conditionalization must be justified in order to justify...

    Similar

    Dynamic principles like Conditionalization must be justified in order ...91%A full theory of inference that answers Hume's challenge must appeal t...88%A full theory of inference must account for the dynamic nature of indu...83%Inductive inference is justified even without proof that its conclusio...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: formal-epistemology
    View source passageHide passage
    The details of these arguments can get very technical, so we won’t examine them here. The important thing for the moment is to appreciate that (i) inductive inference is a dynamic process, since it involves changing our beliefs over time, but (ii) the general probability axioms, and particular assignments of prior probabilities like Carnap’s, are static, concerning only the initial probabilities. Thus (iii) a full theory of inference that answers Hume’s challenge must appeal to additional, dynam

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective