Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Kant concedes that space does not belong to objects as th... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Representing empirical objects in space is not illusory.

    Kant concedes that space does not belong to objects as they are in themselves, meaning spatial experience fails to disclose the true nature of reality.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Kant distinguishes phenomena (things as they appear) from noumena (things-in-themselves), placing space in the former category.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Space is a form of human sensibility, not a property of objects independent of minds, so it cannot reveal their intrinsic nature.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Our spatial intuitions are constitutive of experience rather than descriptive of reality, limiting what they can disclose about objects.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Kant grants that space structures all possible human experience legitimately; calling this 'failure to disclose' conflates limitation with falsity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If noumena are entirely unknowable, claiming space 'fails' to reveal them assumes knowledge of what true nature actually is.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Spatial properties reliably predict behavior and enable successful interaction; calling this non-disclosive of reality seems arbitrary.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedPerception1 linked

    Related

    If noumena are entirely unknowable, claiming space 'fails' to reveal them assume...Kant distinguishes phenomena (things as they appear) from noumena (things-in-the...Kant grants that space structures all possible human experience legitimately; ca...Our spatial intuitions are constitutive of experience rather than descriptive of...
    +3 moreShow less
    Representing empirical objects in space is not illusory.Space is a form of human sensibility, not a property of objects independent of m...Spatial properties reliably predict behavior and enable successful interaction; ...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit