Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Kant demonstrated that existence is not a predicate, undermining the ontological argument's inference from conceivability to actuality.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Kant conflates existence-as-predicate with existence-as-property; existence might be a special logical operator, not a property.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Even if existence isn't a traditional predicate, Anselm's argument might work through modal or higher-order logical reasoning.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Kant's distinction doesn't address why conceiving a maximally great being should differ logically from conceiving other necessary truths.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Existence adds no new qualities to a concept; a real hundred dollars has no properties beyond an imagined hundred dollars.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Conceivability cannot guarantee actuality, since we can coherently imagine non-existent things without contradiction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
If existence were a predicate, we could derive contradictions by treating it like other properties in logical analysis.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.