Kant's analytic of the beautiful establishes that genuine aesthetic judgment requires a felt response of pleasure or displeasure accompanied by a claim to universal communicability.

?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

Aesthetic judgment(Lyotard's appropriation of Kantian aesthetic judgment for the problem of justice.): Judgment that does not produce denotative knowledge about a determinable state of affairs, but refers to the way our faculties interact as we move among modes of phrasing (denotative, prescriptive, performative, political, cognitive, artistic, etc.).
Analytic of the Beautiful(as Kant's specific framework being referenced): A detailed investigation Kant conducted into what makes something beautiful and how we judge beauty. It's basically his theory about the rules and requirements for calling something genuinely beautiful.
Kant(as used in epistemology and metaphysics): Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) was an influential German philosopher who argued that our minds shape how we experience reality, and that we can only truly know things as they appear to us, not as they are in themselves.
Universal communicability(epistemology/philosophy of language)

Based on where you are in your exploration